Talk:Constitution of Medina
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Constitution of Medina article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
broken link
[edit]The link to the text itself is broken in:
The division of the constitution into numbered articles is not in the original text but added later by scholars. The numbering of clauses differs in different sources, but there is general agreement on the authenticity of ---the most widely-read version of the charter---, which is found in Ibn Ishaq's Sirah Rasul Allah. LeesOtter (talk) 21:58, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Text of constitution
[edit]The text is semi-long, and putting text this long on wikipedia isn't common. Should the text be moved to Wikisouce, and then linked to? Eievie (talk) 20:24, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, it appears the issue is that there isn't an English translation old enough to be out of copyright. The earliest I can find so far is Muhammad Hamidullah's 1941 one. Eievie (talk) 00:19, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
Evident NPOV abuse on Page
[edit]As I read this page, I noticed that there was a negative tone in it despite the theme of the page being supposedly positive. I reviewed this page's history and noticed among the many examples of abuse, one specific contributor has visited and decimated a portion of this page and introduced the problematic NPOV. When i visited the user's talk page, I discovered that their behaviour is thematic, consequently earning a topic ban on Islam related pages for NPOV abuse, as the issue was raised in the Admin Incident Report page.
I am unable to revert their abusive edits to be inline with the arbitration outcome as they are too old and now incorporated with recent edits.
@Vice regent — I am tagging you as you are an involved party of the arbitration and I think this matter may deserve your attention. Bro The Man (talk) 07:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Bro The Man are you referring to the Kaalakaa topic ban? VR (Please ping on reply) 11:33, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, however the edits here pre-date the topic ban. Bro The Man (talk) 11:37, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Bro The Man why don't you go ahead and fix the NPOV issues? VR (Please ping on reply) 13:20, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Sure thing! Now that you are aware and pretext is established on this talk page, I'm hoping to avoid getting dragged into an edit war by those responsible when I start addressing the issue. Please place this page on your watchlist. I'll start slowly going through it over the next couple weeks. I'll ping you if there's anything that can't be settled on the talk pages amicably.
- Cheers :) Bro The Man (talk) 18:24, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Bro The Man why don't you go ahead and fix the NPOV issues? VR (Please ping on reply) 13:20, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, however the edits here pre-date the topic ban. Bro The Man (talk) 11:37, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class Islam-related articles
- Mid-importance Islam-related articles
- WikiProject Islam articles
- C-Class Judaism articles
- Low-importance Judaism articles
- C-Class Human rights articles
- Mid-importance Human rights articles
- WikiProject Human rights articles
- C-Class law articles
- Mid-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- C-Class Saudi Arabia articles
- Low-importance Saudi Arabia articles
- WikiProject Saudi Arabia articles